Maybe some of the mob would like to have their clones. Then, what would be their uses? What are their harms?
This cloning idea is invented by scientist. These could be use for organ donations and many other more. This clones dramatically increase the world's population. Plus, obviously, the church is against this cloning thing and they agree in its results and ways, because cloning is over the boundary of true life. The church believes that the only superior being, Jesus Christ has the only right to control life.
Cloning is possible in the future. Because of technology the boundary of real life is intruded. For the sick ones, cloning would be too helpful for them. As easy as replacing the damaged organ, which are done by them, to the healthy organ of your clone. Would it be fair? And for the criminal's percent of the mob, it would be easy for them to commit crime then accuse their clone. Again, would it be fair enough? For the celebrity persons, if they have clones, which one would you be a fan of? Who is better among them? Would it be fair? And if it is, we could have a better clone of Micheal Jackson. Would it be fair for him? Still, different types of opinions are given by also different kinds of people.
Clones, who owns them?
We are talking about life here. I agree that there is only one that can give and can take back our life, GOD. It is unfair for those clones, they still own a lie, and it is really a life. It is not fair because they can never enjoy a true happiness of life because they are only used as a "extra spare parts" for the true one.
ReplyDelete